“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” – Dr George Brock Chisholm, first Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) from 1948 to 1953.
The UN in general seems to be a largely woke, neo-Marxist, global socialist organization beholden mostly to their donors, whom also work through nation governments, think tanks, NGOs and corporations.
I used to have this saying “Capitalism is schizo-communism”. “Schizo” meaning “split” or “fractured”. What I meant by it was that capitalism, as usury, will inevitably lead to corporatism – Mussolini’s term for fascism – which isn’t far from the state-controlled market under communism. Now corporations, government and institutions are shuffled into following the woke political agenda. I suggest that 3AO7 could provide a better framework for evaluating the conduct of corporations, governments and institutions.
– 3 – would evaluate based on a myriad of environmental factors of a vision of a clean, natural, healthy and thriving humanity and nature, but not in a hurry to restrict carbon dioxide generally.
– A – would evaluate based on of scientific and religious world view, as well as hemp-positive. Financing the war on hemp would give massive minus points.
– O – would evaluate based on respect for negative- and positive individual liberty. It would mostly concern governments. Lockdown- and mandate governments would’ve gotten big minus points, as does high economic inequality and prevalence of poverty.
– 7 – would evaluate race-, sex, sexuality-, etc. neutrality/-equality. Philosophy and policy contrary to this principle would get a lower evaluation.